进行诉讼

Basing on historic analysis, the author studies the different mechanisms of the system of handling cases involving both criminal and civil factors in countries belonging to different law systems and under different legal cultural backgrounds. Through this, the author attempts to come to his own reasonable answer to the choice of mode of incidental civil action.

这是在历史分析的基础上，对附带民事诉讼制度所进行的现代横向比较考察，通过考察不同法系、不同法律文化背景下不同国家对待刑、民交叉案件的不同处理机制，试图对附带民事诉讼这一刑民交叉案件的处理模式选择作出自己理性的回答。

This chapter mainly analyzes and appraises the regulation of domination, suit way, preceding procedure, accuser and appellee inthe effective procedural mechanism of civil liabilities of misrepresentation in securities market.

本章针对现有证券市场虚假陈述民事赔偿诉讼机制中的管辖、诉讼方式、前置程序、原告和被告的确定等进行了剖析和评价。

From international law, the angle sets forth illegal being similar to the case middle Japan government counterargument reason here then detailedly.Go deep into the legal rules analysing our country "comfort women " sufferer basis and the international law citing instituting legal proceedings in Japan relevance meanwhile.Bring forward measure , approach how to resolve the feasibility that a problem in the field of practice then.Great importance solving as well as our country "comfort women " requires that the Japan government carries out the reparations of war problem.

接着从国际法角度详细阐述此类诉讼案件中日本政府抗辩理由的不法性，与此同时深入分析我国"慰安妇"受害者在日本提起诉讼的依据和援引的国际法相关的法律规定，进而提出如何解决该问题在实践方面的可行性措施、途径，以及我国"慰安妇"要求日本政府进行战争赔偿问题解决的重大意义。

On the aspect of criminal justice, the justice method is from the original way of interrogation that is dominated by judge, to the present counterplot system that is dominated by both accusing party and accused party on lawcourt.

我国1996年修订的《刑事诉讼法》，对原来的刑事诉讼制度进行了较大的改革，在某些方面借鉴和吸收了英美法系国家有益的做法，表现在刑事审判方式上，就是从以前由法官主导的审问制向由控辩双方主导的对抗制进行转变，对抗制的庭审方式应该更加有利于保障被告人的诉讼权利，对实现司法公正起到促进作用。

Firstly, the thesis analyzes and delimitates the research object of the lawsuit function, and brings forward the logical access to functional analysis of lawsuit, in order to construct thinking structures for the global research.

首先，本文在对诉讼这一功能研究的主体指向进行了分析界定，并提出对这一意义的诉讼主体进行功能分析的逻辑进路，为总体研究搭建思维架构。

In chapter three,that is the basic content of burden of proof,firstly,the dissertation totally repudiates the view that case facts are the object of bur-den of roof and also maintains that the objects of burden of proof of Chinais requirement facts.

在第三章证明责任基本内容中，其一，对案件事实作为证明责任对象的观点进行了全面否定，并认为我国证明责任对象为要件事实；其二，在比较两大法系证明责任适用条件的基础上，对我国证明责任适用条件所涉及的理论基础和条件进行了新的解释；其三，主张证明责任的性质是一种法定的风险分配，并与当事人的诉讼活动无关；其四，主张在当事人主义和职权主义诉讼中都存在着适用证明责任裁判的可能性。

Inquests of novel disseisin, mort d'ancestor, and darreinpresentment shall be taken only in their proper county court.

对于新近土地强占诉讼，父辈土地强占诉讼，以及darrein诉讼的审判，只能在他们本郡恰当的法庭进行。

In order to discover the thread of though andfind out the internal relations of the many theories concerning theobject of action,in this chapter the author discusses the theories incivil law countries such as Germany and Japan according to theirhistoric order.

为了在流派林立、观点杂芜的诉讼标的理论学说中理出一个清析的脉络，找出它们之间的师承关系和内在联系，本部分按照诉讼标的理论学说发展的历史过程，对德、日为代表的世界大陆法系民事诉讼标的理论分别进行了全面的考察。

Criminal procedural judicial review refers to the review on illegal behavior according to procedure.

刑事程序性司法审查是指在刑事诉讼中按照法定的诉讼程序对程序性违法行为进行的审查，它直接决定了刑事诉讼保障人权目的的实现程度。

Criminal procedural judicial review refers to the review on illegal behavior according to procedure. It determines the realization degree of the purpose directly; purpose is criminal procedure protect-right.

刑事程序性司法审查是指在刑事诉讼中按照法定的诉讼程序对程序性违法行为进行的审查，它直接决定了刑事诉讼保障人权目的的实现程度。

Life. But the intrinsic way of the Internet by wire confines accessing and using of the network information.

然而，Internet固有的有线连接方式大大限制了人们对网络信息的访问和使用。

I have a strong persuasion that this is true .

我坚信这是正确的。