判断

But the morality is in principle not quantifiable and untestable speculation, few researchers investigate the practical research on relevant morality cognition. The research method employs Social Judgment Theory,(SJT, Hammond, 1975) to investigate that Kaohsiung city citizen think about multiple attributes relevant information to reflect morality cognition of fairness or careness in the everyday life. The aim is to prove the abstract concept of morality judgment, provide the base of empirical structure in the future study, and reflect individuality society structure state.

本研究以社会判断(Social Judgment Theory， SJT)为研究方法，探讨高雄市民众在日常生活运作中，必须同时考虑多个相关属性资讯，依本身价值体系直觉认知对於日常公、私事务作价值判断，成为日常生活最基本的现象，藉由道德认知代验证公平或关怀的抽象观，提供未道德研究的实证架构，以及从个体同的道德认知判断的结果反映所在社会生活域结构。

In about the last decade of the nineteenth century, social science positivism reached its final form by realizing, or decreeing that there is a fundamental difference between facts and values, and that only factual judgments are within the competence of science: scientific social science is incompetent to pronounce value judgments, and must avoid value judgments altogether.

大约在十九世纪最后十年，社会科学实证主义到达其最后形式，认识到或者说判定，事实和价值之间具有根本的差异，只有事实判断为科学之力所能及：科学的社会科学无力宣示价值判断，必须完全避开价值判断。

There is a brief introduction about the development of western just view in Chapter one, among them it is a key about understanding of the social just concept and value judgment, which create the academic background for the just dispute of Rolls and Nozick, promise that will explain next at the same time; Chapter two in this text should explain emphatically, through the two theory frame exposition and comparative analysis, we can draw the conclusion that the essential of the dispute focuses on the value judgment of social justice, that is to say , it is the understanding to right " question ; It is the investigation of social background aboutthe dispute mainly in Chapter three, this shows , the thinking essences of any social justice are all demanded by the reform to the unreasonable social current situations , and this kind of reform often needs implementing to the system or system aspect, therefore the thinking to the theory needs putting in the specific social environment, only through this can we make the accurate judgment ; Begin from chapter four, it is the practical problem that the full text needs solved, namely the unjust problem existing in the transitional country. By probing into the reference meaning of just ideas between Roils and Nozick, and build up foreshadowing for the system of the last chapter; The last chapter, the corresponding solution has be put forward aimed at the origin of the unjust phenomenon that our society make the transition, namely under the background of system innovation, we should structure the scientific management mode, and realize from "good policy " to the basic " good at managing .

第一章简要的介绍了西方正义观的演变过程，其中关于社会正义概念的理解和价值判断是个关键，同时也是为接下来要阐述的罗尔斯、诺齐克正义观的争论创设一个理论的背景；第二章是本文要着重阐述的环节，通过对两者理论框架的阐述和比较分析，得出两者争论的根本还是社会正义的价值判断上，也就是对于&权利&问题的理解；第三章的设置主要对两者争论的社会背景的考察，由此可以看出，任何社会正义的思考实质都是对不合理的社会现状的改革诉求，而这种改革往往需要落实到体制或制度层面，因而对于理论的思考也需要放在特定的社会环境中，才能做出准确的判断；从第四章开始，是全文需要解决的实际问题，即针对转型国家在转型中存在的非正义问题，探讨罗尔斯、诺齐克正义理念的借鉴意义，并为最后一章的制度架构做铺垫；全文最后一章，针对我国社会转型中的非正义现象的产生根源，提出了相应的解决办法，亦即在制度创新的背景下，构建科学管理模式，实现从&善政&到&善治&的根本转变。

You see, when you know that your life experience always unfolds as a mirror for what you believe, and then you learn that the judgments that you make when someone else makes you angry, it creates experiences of someone else doing something to you, victimizing you in some way, being sick, you suddenly stop and realize that you are the one that is suffering all of the effects of your judgments, not the person you think you are judging.

想想看，当你明白你的生活经历彷佛一面镜子，揭示了你的内在信念时，你就会发现，当自己做出「某某令你愤怒」的判断时，这个判断就会创造出别人对你做的事，或者以某种方式伤害你，或者生病的经验，你会突然停下来，意识到你才是你的判断的受害者，伤害你的并非你正在批判的那个人。

In order to make up the deficiencies of the actual law, the supreme court promulgate a law named the rules about evidences in civil procedure which uses other countries'salutary experiences for reference and integrates the situationg of our country as well as the basic diathesis of the judges. It establish the principle of modern free evaluaion of evidence that rules the judges look through the evidences according to the legal procedures. Other than following occupational moralities, the judges should handle logistic illations and experiences of daily life to estimate probative power and evidential ability of evidences roundly and objectively.

为弥补现行立法上的漏洞与缺陷，在借鉴其他国家的有益经验的基础上，最高人民法院于2001年12月21日颁布的《关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》从我国的现实国情出发并结合我国法官队伍的基本素质，在证据的审查判断上确立了现代自由心证原则，即审判人员应当依照法定程序，全面、客观地审核证据，依据法律的规定，遵循法官职业道德，运用逻辑推理和日常生活经验，对证据有无证明力和证明力大小独立进行判断，并公开判断的理由和结果。

Methods:TAUS was performed in 64 gastric carcinoma patients proved by biopsy (the assessment of tumor invasion depth was based on the thickening and the disruption of the gastric wall by a hypoechoic mass, and the sliding sign on sonography was applied to determine the invasions of liver and pancreas), of which the results were compared with postoperativ...

结果：TAUS对胃癌T分期的判断准确率为56。 0%，其中T1 66。 7%，T2 28。 6%，T3 73。 1%，T4 50。 0%。TAUS判断胃周各脏器组织浸润的特异性均为100%，而对胰腺、肝脏浸润的敏感性分别为71。 4%(5 /7)和50。 0%(2 /4)。结论：TAUS对胃癌术前T分期的判断有一定的临床应用价值，其可作为胃癌患者的术前常规检查。

Observations : In syllogisms , a singular judgment can be treated like the universal , but in respect to quantity it stands as unity to infinity and is therefore essentially different .

但是如果我们把一个单称判断仅仅作为知识，按照量与一个普遍有效的判断进行比较，那么，这种知识与普遍有效的判断的关系就如同单一与无限的关系，因而就其自身而言与后者有本质性的区别。

The problem of phase order in transformer substation s erection;2. The wire linking is completely checked by active power value,reactive power value,mutual inductor polarity, phase order and the link of detecting instruments.

分析了功率测量的基本原理、判断错接线的方法，提出用有功测量值来判断接线的正确性是不全面的，应从有功测量值、无功测量值、互感器极性和相序以及测量仪器的接线判断接线的正误。

The existence of a standard of comparison enables to bring these distinct judgments about the relative standings of individuals with respect to their preference orderings into a single judgment about total utility. As we have just seen, however, the pareto judgment has empirical significance independent of its connection to utility.

这种比较标准的存在使我们将这些不同的判断汇集到一个单独的关于总效用的判断，这些不同的判断是关于有偏好需求的个人相关立场的标准，然而正如我们所见，帕累托标准独立于其与效用的联系而具有着实践上的意义。

Today require students to complete a chlorinated paraffin, when the number of species, there are very few students have forgotten any judgments, although I put the time in class to determine the method to write on the blackboard, two; but the face of such When the situation, I did not angry, but a very patiently to determine ways to re-explain it to them in detail, though I talked to repeat 5 times, and to account for the time in learning the key to knowledge of the record class.

今天在要求学生完成烷烃的一氯代物种数的时候，有很几个学生都已经忘记任何判断了，虽然我在上课的时候就把判断的方法在黑板上书写了两次；但面对这样情况的时候，我没有生气，而是很耐心地把判断方法再次详细地讲解给他们听，虽然我重复讲了5次，并交代他们在学习的时候该记录上课的关键知识。

Means the parent directory, so this command means to execute "toolchain.sh," which is in the current directory.

代表父目录，所以这个命令就是执行当前目录下的"toolchain.sh"。

Yes,In fact,I'm on our city ream.

是的。事实上我是我们市队的。