- 更多网络例句与感情的误置相关的网络例句 [注：此内容来源于网络，仅供参考]
-
The 'arrival' of Sisyphus means that he has to employ 'pathetic fallacy' to personify the stone as signifying man's desire and mental burden – the stone lying at the roadside has been changed and elevated to a symbolic level, which incorporates the myth with heroic spirit and becomes the objective equivalent to that of desire, anxiety, and pressure. In essence, the physical features are drowned and from between to express the natural physical features or the ideas, he chooses the latter. This means that there is disjoint between what originally moved him and what he would like to express, but he is acutely aware of it – the 'danger of illustration'. We can see that these series of paintings are finally presented to us, the physical features of the objects still remains and are expressed to some extent. Among them some directly depict the stones in their own part about their pleats and points, desolateness and heaviness; at the meantime, nobody appears in the pictures.
西西弗斯的"到来"，意味着他不得不采用感情误置的方式，将石头进行拟人化的处理，用以指称人的欲望和精神负担——那块路边的石头已经不复它本来的面目，它被提升到一个象征的位置上，与神话和英雄的精神题旨迅速结合在一起，成为人性之中欲望、焦虑、压力等情感的客观对应物，从本质上来说，物自身的特性被淹没了，在表现物的自然特性和表现理念这两者之间，他选择了后者，这意味着，在感动他的最初事实与他要表现的事实之间就有了一种脱节，但他敏感地意识到了这种脱节，这种"图解的危险"，我们可以看到，当这组画最终呈现在我们面前的时候，物的自然特性得到了很大程度的挽留和表现，其中有一些画作直接描绘了岩石本身，它本身的褶皱和棱角、苍凉和沉重，同时，并没有人出现在这样的画面上。
-
His blunders of interpretation are due to what has been described as the "pathetic fallacy".
他在解释事物方面之所以每每出错，是由于人们所说的那种&感情的误置&。
-
The 'arrival' of Sisyphus means that he has to employ 'pathetic fallacy' to personify the stone as signifying man's desire and mental burden – the stone lying at the roadside has been changed and elevated to a symbolic level, which incorporates the myth with heroic spirit and becomes the objective equivalent to that of desire, anxiety, and pressure. In essence, the physical features are drowned and from between to express the natural physical features or the ideas, he chooses the latter. This means that there is disjoint between what originally moved him and what he would like to express, but he is acutely aware of it – the 'danger of illustration'. We can see that these series of paintings are finally presented to us, the physical features of the objects still remains and are expressed to some extent. Among them some directly depict the stones in their own part about their pleats and points, desolateness and heaviness; at the meantime, nobody appears in the pictures.
西西弗斯的&到来&，意味着他不得不采用感情误置的方式，将石头进行拟人化的处理，用以指称人的欲望和精神负担——那块路边的石头已经不复它本来的面目，它被提升到一个象征的位置上，与神话和英雄的精神题旨迅速结合在一起，成为人性之中欲望、焦虑、压力等情感的客观对应物，从本质上来说，物自身的特性被淹没了，在表现物的自然特性和表现理念这两者之间，他选择了后者，这意味着，在感动他的最初事实与他要表现的事实之间就有了一种脱节，但他敏感地意识到了这种脱节，这种&图解的危险&，我们可以看到，当这组画最终呈现在我们面前的时候，物的自然特性得到了很大程度的挽留和表现，其中有一些画作直接描绘了岩石本身，它本身的褶皱和棱角、苍凉和沉重，同时，并没有人出现在这样的画面上。
- 更多网络解释与感情的误置相关的网络解释 [注：此内容来源于网络，仅供参考]
-
pathetic fallacy：感情误置
他那著名的"感情误置"(Pathetic Fallacy)学说便是挑战"新古典主义"所缵承的古典时期的"理性". "感情误置"不仅仅意味着对自然界的诗意抒怀,更是拉斯金得以批评文艺复兴以降过于强调"人性"的一种方式,由此,
-
pathetic fallacy：感情的误置
感情不外露的人/dry fellow | 感情的误置/pathetic fallacy | 感情内涵/emotional charge