就...方面说

Like I said in another thread, you're really good in archealogy, but pathetically poor in logic, and in philosophy as well due to your fetishism in evidence.

就像我在另一帖里说过的一样，你在考古方面很在行，但是你的逻辑分析能力差得可怜，而且由于你对所谓证据的盲目崇拜，想必你的哲学也一塌糊涂。

Care Internet only Guest of a rich ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- It is Laozhou below the comment to this article and oneself view 1, the ignorance to adversary, this has been mentioned above big head, look down on adversary, the product that perhaps does not understand adversary, dynamic; The idea with a lot of new as a result flatter oneself, actually others had been done early 2, the ignorance to the industry, this also is above had mentioned; Nevertheless besides newest trends, academic, product, a lot of people lack his analysis and judgement to the industry of the place, the result can resemble myna be being become euqally only a microphone, meet only in products plan respect blindly imitate 3, the ignorance to oneself, in the specific details that the person often is immersed in him place easily to do, see very local thing only, edit to wait not to understand to technology, design normally for example, and the thing that the technology puts the view in program, code only; And if do not know structure of catenary of oneself product characteristic, target, job,wait more the thing of global sex, the problem is done not have in traditional automation line job, greater value cannot be produced in the job that gives priority to with mental work in Internet, cannot obtain progress 4, the spokesman that likes to do people, no less than is big say, the individual the habit serves as the habit of broad user, arrive deep really rarely however in the user, listen the think of a way of themselves, like to use affirmation very much, of course, certain, natural such positive statement, support without real data at all however 5, nearsightedness, impatient.

只关心互联网梁铁欣的一篇博客----------------------------------------------------------------------------以下是老周对此篇文章的评论和自己的看法 1、对对手的无知，这是大头上面提到过的，看不起对手，或者不了解对手的产品、动态；结果很多自以为新奇的点子，其实别人早就做过了 2、对行业的无知，这也是上面提到过的；不过除了最新动态、理论、产品外，很多人对所在的行业缺乏自己的分析和判定，结果就只会像八哥一样当个传声筒，在产品设计方面则只会一味的模拟 3、对自己的无知，人往往轻易陷入自己所做的具体细节里，只看到非常局部的东西，例如编辑通常对技术、设计等不了解，而技术则只把目光放在程序、代码的东西；而假如不了解自己的产品特色、目标、工作链结构等更全局性的东西，在传统的流水线工作中没有问题，在互联网以脑力劳动为主的工作中则无法发挥出更大的价值，无法取得进步 4、喜欢做人民的代言人，正如大头说的，将个人习惯作为广大用户的习惯，却很少真的深入到用户中去，倾听他们自己的想法，很喜欢用肯定、当然、一定、自然这样的肯定词，却根本没有实际的数据支持 5、短视，急躁。

In this respect,this is the age of enlightenment, or the century of Frederick.

就这方面考虑，这个时代乃是启蒙的时代，或者说乃是腓德烈的世纪。

In this respect our age is the age of enlightenment, the century of Frederick.

就这方面考虑，这个时代乃是启蒙的时代，或者说乃是腓德烈的世纪。

Analysts were quick to pounce on the gaff by McCain who has repeatedly emphasized his experience in national security affairs and said he would make Iraq a major issue in the presidential campaign.

分析人士很快就拿麦凯恩的失言大作文章。麦凯恩反复强调他在国家安全事务方面的经验。他说，他会让伊拉克成为总统竞选的主要议题。

I think so, like I said you have to take these things in good faith.

我想是的。就象我说的那样，还是从积极的方面去考虑这些问题吧。

Since through the study of original works, a general concepts will be hold in one's own heart together with the direction for which the discipline researches.

其实你可以说，如果一般人想研究一副画作的技术方面的东西，比如颜料的质地啊，混的是什么油啊，某些风格的画家怎么样通过颜料制造立体感啊，就没办法通过复制品研究了，因为电脑上的画是二维的，怎么研究咧。。。

If you have some complains to others, you should speak frankly to her, even she was unwilling to correct, she would know about it at least that her behavior made hostler unhappy..

我的观点是：她背后说别人，那是不道德的小人行为；有什么意见就在她当面提出来，让她改正，即使她不改正，她至少也知道在某些方面她让主人不痛快！

During the 19th and 20th centuries there were huge achievements on philosophy literature art and music; a variety of activities were also booming at that time Richard Strauss(1864-1949) born at that era when the social phenomena influenced his music learning process combined the classical and romantic music styles and further developed his unique composing style There were 5 chapters in the dissertation The research motivation purposes methodology and the literature review were included in Chapter One Chapter 2 focused on understanding how the history background and personal attitude influenced Richard Strauss' composing style Through the study of the romantic musicians like Franz Schubert1797-1828 Robert Schumann(1810-1856 Johannes Brahms(1833-1897) Hugo Wolf(1860-1903) Gustav Mahler(1860-1911) and etc I attempted to get a complete picture of musical evolution in Chapter 3 In addition Richard's classic compositions were categorized and organized in order to gain a deep understanding of his music From the study and the analysis of Strauss'"Vier letzte Lieder" the features styles the format and the life of the two poets Hermann Hesse1877-1962）and Joseph von Eichendorff(1788-1857 were explored and the relationship between the music of this composition and the poetry were also discussed Chapter 5 summarized the main arguments to give a short account of Strauss' lifetime rich experiences and thinking in his eighties

横跨十九、二十世纪的理察·史特劳斯（Richard Strauss，1864-1949）正是欧洲人文发展空前灿烂的年代，无论在哲学思想、文学、美术以及音乐方面，都有辉煌的成就。在他音乐学习历程中，结合了古典时期及浪漫时期两种音乐风格，发展出独特的作曲风格。本论文分成五章：第一章绪论包括研究动机、研究目的、研究方法及步骤以及文献探讨；第二章则从对理查史特劳斯生平的详实记载中，了解他创作作品的时代背景和心情；第三章则就浪漫时期艺术歌曲作家舒伯特（Franz Schubert1797-1828）、舒曼（Robert Schumann1810-1856）、布拉姆斯（Johannes Brahms1833-1897）、沃尔夫（Hugo Wolf1860-1903）及马勒（Gustav Mahler1860-1911）等，以诗人、旋律、伴奏型态及曲式和声，稍加整理并说明，以便了解艺术歌曲在此时期之演变过程。并将理查史特劳斯艺术歌曲作品分类统整，藉此对他的艺术歌曲能有更深一步的了解。第四章《四首最后的歌》之音乐探究与分析，则探讨此部作品诗人赫塞（Hermann Hesse 1877 - 1962）及艾辛朵夫（Joseph von Eichendorff﹐1788-1857）的生平和作品特色，以及诗的结构与格式，和此部作品音乐与诗的关系。第五章结语说明史特劳斯一生丰富经历与晚年想法，创作出一组宁静感人又深刻的终曲。

Yes, I will admit that i was, as I have said, of ignorance on the matter of

不错，我承认，在爱情方面，就像我说的那样，我是一无所知的，但我并不愚蠢。

We will see more and more activist government policies that distinguish economic activities according to the nationality of the actors.

我们将看到越来越多激进的政府政策，这些政策根据企业的国籍来区分经济活动。

If we can prove the independence of an axiomatic system, then we can guarantee the conciseness of this system, ie.

如果能够证明某个一阶谓词系统的独立性，那么就能够保证该系统的建立是精炼的，即没有任何一条公理或推理规则是多余的。