宣告...无罪

The first forensic specialist to analyze the blood spatter pattern, said they were inconclusive. This is a police expert, by the way. He said the spatters could not prove that she fired a gun. He's asking you to believe that she wore gloves to commit the crime to explain the lack of powder residue on her hands. Then she took the gloves off to handle the murder weapon. Is it possible there was a burglar? The prosecution certainly can't eliminate the idea. And, yes, it's possible that Susan May, seeing her husband making love with another woman, went into a dissociative state, acted outside of her conscious control. But it doesn't really matter whether she pulled that trigger or not ... Because she formed no legal mental intent to do so which is an element of the crime. Reasonable doubt as to whether or not she did it. No evidence of intent, even if she did. All leads to the same verdict. Not guilty.

第一位法庭专家分析血滴飞溅点时说，无法做出结论，顺便一提，这位警方专家，他说这些飞溅并不能证明是她开的枪，他希望你们相信，她带着手套实施犯罪，所以才检测不出火药残余，然后她再脱下手套拿起凶器，也可能是一个盗贼，检控方并不能排除这可能性，好吧，也可能就是Susan May，看到丈夫正和别的女人胡搞，陷入精神分裂的状态，做出了完全是无意识的举动，但她有没有扣动扳机并不重要，因为那种状态下她不具备法律意义上的意图犯罪，而这正是定罪的关键，关于她有否开枪的合理怀疑…就算是她开的枪也没有证据显示她是有意而为，这些都将指向同一个判决——无罪。

After law French went out of official use in the courts,the shortened form cul. prit was misinterpreted as a term of address used by the clerk to a prisoner indicted for high treason or felony and pleading "not guilty."

在诺曼人的法律法语不限于在法庭中使用后，其缩略形式 cul.prit 被错误地理解为一种称呼，书记员用它来称呼被控犯有判国罪或重罪但又申辩&无罪&的犯人。

The company mainly produces all kinds of industry screening machines, food packaging machine (solid, liquid, granular, powder), and bottled beer packaging machine assembly line, as well as large-scale wind transport, dedusting equipment design and installation.

公司主要生产各种行业用筛选机、食品包装机（固体、液体、粒状、粉状）、啤酒包装机和罐装流水线以及大型风力输送、除尘设备的设计与安装。

They began to embroider little squares of cloth.

陪同他的是学校的校长，西科尔斯卡小姐。