discretion in conduct

discretion in conduct的基本解释

-

操守

与discretion in conduct相关的网络例句 [注：此内容来源于网络，仅供参考]

Specific instances of the conduct of a witness, for the purpose of attacking or supporting the witness' character for truthfulness, other than conviction of crime as provided in rule 609, may not be proved by extrinsic evidence They may, however, in the discretion of the court, if probative of truthfulness or untruthfulness, be inquired into on cross-examination of the witness (1) concerning the witness' character for truthfulness or untruthfulness, or (2) concerning the character for truthfulness or untruthfulness of another witness as to which character the witness being cross-examined has testified.

出于攻击或支持证人可靠性的目的，除规则609所规定的定罪判决外，关于证人行为的具体实例不得以外在证据予以证明。但若是为了证明证人可信或不可信，则根据法庭的自由裁量，可以通过对该证人交叉盘问以下两方面事项，予以调查关于证人行为的具体实例：(1)关于该证人可信与不可信的品格，以及(2)关于其他证人可信与不可信的品格，后者的品格在对该证人交叉盘问时曾得到证实。

This discretion of conduct had inured to his credit. None the less, he had set two men to chattering: the porter, in the convent, and he knew the singularities of their parlor, and the grave-digger, at the cemetery, and he was acquainted with the peculiarities of their sepulture; in this way, he possessed a double light on the subject of these nuns, one as to their life, the other as to their death.

这种谨慎的作风是为人重视的，他却并不因此而不去找人聊天，他常找的两个人，在修院里，是门房，他因而知道会客室里的一些特别情形；在坟场里，是埋葬工人，因而他知道墓地里的一些独特之处，正好象他有两盏灯在替他照着那些修女们，一盏照着生的一面，一盏照着死的一面。

Since, however, the discretion is being exercised in the context of an acquittal – the averments constituting the charges having been found by the jury as not amounting to the crimes alleged – it follows that, generally speaking, the conduct most relevant to the matters under consideration must be the defendant's conduct during the investigation and at the trial: How he first responded to the investigators, the answers he gave when confronted with the accusations, the consistency of those answers with his subsequent defence, etc.

另外一个考虑，上诉人被警方调查的时候，正如梁大律师所指，上诉人亦同意当时他是与该女事主发生性行为，而同意当时是见到第一被告人与女事主发生性行为之后，便去了浴室，而他自己抱著好奇心与女事主发生性行为的。无论该女事主当时是同意或正如何大律师指出这是一位在十六岁开始已与男朋友发生性行为的女士。这些考虑本席认为不适宜用於在裁判法官可考虑的地方，因为这不是审讯而是裁判法官只考虑有关上诉人当时的行为和所提及的口供来分析后，认为上诉人可否获得讼费。正如梁大律师指出，这是裁判法官有绝对的酌情权。