查询词典 veraciousness

From these 4 studies, we could got the following conclusions:(1) The CPAI 22 traits could be divided into two categories, with the changing of age, period and cohort, type I traits didn't change, they were Logical vs Affective Orientation, Enterprise, Responsibility, Inferiority vs Self-Acceptance, Optimism vs Pessimism, Face, Family, Defensive, Graciousness vs Meanness; While with the changing of age, period and cohort, type II traits changed, they were Leadership, Self vs. Social Orientation, Veraciousness vs Slickness, Traditionalism vs Modernity, Harmony, Renqing, Meticulousness, Extraversion vs Introversion, Emotionality, Practical Mindedness, Internal vs External Locus of Control, Thrift vs Extravagance, Discipline.

总结上述四个研究的结果，我们可以得出如下结论：（1）CPAI所包含的人格特质可以分为两类，第一类人格特质不随社会发展的时间与空间分布以及年龄、代群发生明显的变化，这些人格特质包含：理智-情感、开拓性、责任感、自卑-自信、乐-悲观、面子、亲情、防御性、宽容-刻薄；第二类人格特质随着社会发展、年龄与代群三个纵向变量的发生一致性变化或者交互变化，这些人格特质包含：领导性、自我-社会取向、老实-圆滑、传统-现代性、和谐性、人情、严谨性、外向性、情绪性、务实性、外控性、节俭性、纪律性；同时，功能差异项目构成的问卷揭示出五个受社会环境影响很大的心理特征，它们分别是：犬儒-现实主义的生活态度、心理适应性、外圆内方的应对风格、自我效能感、个体主义的价值观。

The overall comparison of males and females indicated that Chinese males (N=913) scored higher than Chinese females (N=965) on the following personality scales: Novelty, Diversity, Divergent Thinking, Leadership, Logical Orientation, Enterprise, and Internal Locus of Control; and Chinese females scored higher on Emotionality, Inferiority, Face, Veraciousness, Social Sensitivity, and Harmony.

检视台湾相关的实证研究文献，国家认同和族群认同却基本上是分开处理的，这可能冒著概念窄化的风险；即使有些文献是将二者合并处理，却囿於研究方法的限制，将「台湾民族主义」和「中国民族主义」视为两个相互矛盾、完全不相容的概念，这又可能忽略了这两种论述之间可能存在著基於共同发展历史背景所铺陈的细微相通之处。

This is not an ordinary box, which is used as a background picture of the dialog box, very pretty.

详细说明：这可不是一个一般的对话框，它是用图片作为背景的对话框，非常好看。

Conceal me what I am,and be my aid for such disguise as haply shall become the form of my intent.

遮掩我的身份，帮助我，我的面具将成为我的目的。